Bounded override is how a standing guarantee handles the cases that most tempt a society to revoke standing altogether — serious misconduct and severe incapacity — without letting coercion acquire the person. It rests on the distinction that standing and jurisdiction are different things: the ecology may override what a person is authorized to do — restrict movement, require restitution, incarcerate, mandate treatment under narrow conditions, appoint surrogate decision-makers — without withdrawing them from the field of legitimate concern. The correction the framework makes to its own earlier language is that this is not a contraction of jurisdiction as a whole. Self-jurisdiction remains presumptive and intact; specific powers are overridden one justified exception at a time, each carrying its own reason, scope, and expiry, and the burden of justifying every one of them sits on the coercing authority, not on the participant.
What persists through any override is the floor — sustenance, healthcare, legal review, humane treatment, some communication, and a route back — and, around it, residual self-jurisdiction: everything the override does not actually require stays the participant’s own. Incapacity is handled the same way, through supported decision-making, guardianship only where necessary, least-restrictive intervention, independent advocates, and a presumption of restored authority where recovery is possible — because dependency does not erase membership. The principle keeps standing from collapsing into either failure: becoming meaningless (revoked the moment someone is difficult) or permissive (mistaken for a licence to harm others without consequence). Its fuller working-out is coercion does not acquire the person.