Domain of consequence is the principle the enclosure scenario forces, and the framework treats it as permanent because it is stronger than standing alone. A benevolent system can truthfully say you have standing, you are protected, you are comfortable, you may speak freely and quietly add and nothing you do will substantially change what happens. That is enclosure — and it is why standing must include a viable domain of consequence: somewhere, at some scale, a participant’s judgment alters outcomes, their choices carry weight, and their contribution is not merely ceremonial.
The domain can be small or large — family, craft, and local governance as much as constitutional questions — and it is what separates a participant from a well-kept dependent. Its collective failure is human enclosure; its individual failure is protected irrelevance. The compressed form is the framework’s answer to any welfare-only defense of an AI order: care without consequence is not participation.